What is the politics of a spy organization?

A good question is one where people don't want to give a straight answer. The stock answer, same as THE scientists', is: no politics 

Mike Burgess, Aus Spy Agency Chief:  ASIO is apolitical, my staff are apolitical, they put their lives on the line to actually protect Australians and Australia from threats of security.  I will leave the politics to the politicians.

97.3% identical to what we've heard from countless scientists - we are 

   -   above politics   -

Trouble is: it’s this aboveness that worries me. 

Exhibit A: Mueller’s bungling 7-year investigation/cover-up of Anthrax's origin which succeeded in protecting scientist culture gone mad instead of exposing it.

Exhibit B: The non-decision by the US’s top Intelligence agencies re Covid's origin  - where they told us the origin may never be found - though we’re not allowed to see the evidence they looked at - or didn't.  We don’t even know if they’ve grilled the chief suspects.

The security organizations are singing from the same songsheet from which WHO investigators Daszak and Dwyer delivered their command performances. Time is on our side. Keep obfuscating - years will pass - by then we'll be onto The Next Disease X - we'll be home-free.

Below is an exercise in stating the obvious - but so was saying Covid may have leaked from the right-next-door lab GoFFing-out deadly bat viruses - or saying world-leading expert/WHO investigator Pete Dazza Daszak was dodgy - so it’s worth setting down:

A secret security organization: 

• ’s mission is to guard National Security - identify/combat threats -  maintain/expand the established power structure - the Order.
  
• is a public service career job. The Great Un-elected. They watch politicians cycle through. (Robert Mueller the 3rd’s reign, for example, ran since he became Director of the FBI on Sep 4 2001!!!)
  
• pays good. Great at the top. Massive budget - from your taxes.
  
• is an international network of intelligence gathering agents (spies)
  
• collects/analyses/algorithms globo-data - for surveillance - to maintain order.
  
• is powerful.
  
• requires alliances with powerful international monied-organizations -  including bio-defense/weapons research  - whilst keeping tabs on/back-channeling with non-aligned nations.
  
• is global by nature.
  
• entails a concept of the common-good.  It’s actors are dedicated to uphold that - to keep us secure
  
• can’t divulge details of its operations to protect this common-good - or define what the common-good means - due to National Security.

This last one is the Catch-22 politics at the heart of every National Security organization:

We are empowered to act covertly to secure the common-good.

FAQ: But who defines the common good?

This section has been closed due to the common good. Thank you.

Which is where we get to the no evidence is evidence part.

Here's my conspiracy theory:

(a) Wellcome Trust  - &/+ Bill&Melinda - tick all the above boxes (only difference is they have a private endowment) thereby qualifying as Private Security/Scio-tech Organizations.  You could throw EcoHealth Alliance in there as well, they are private scio-security players,  though 90% government funded.  Also not nearly in the same league as Wellcome/Bill&Melinda financially.

(b) Undercover of the night, there has been a political alignment between private security operations such as Wellcome - and normal ones - including those of China and the US.  They are all focused on Global Security to together fight anti-globalism - which they view as a common enemy.   If you're an enemy of my enemy ...

(c) The above parties conspired to cover-up the origin of Covid.  Not easy to do - unless you happen to be at the helm of the Science/Security/One-Everything Alliance - 20 years on from its 911/Anthrax mega-growth spurt to the frightening mass of unaccountable power/money it is today...

(d) Motive: save Globalization from the crippling blowback that would result from the truth:  One Health scientists, our saviours, caused Covid.  

(e) Covid was then used - to permanently entrench a bio-state stranglehold.  Due to Covid.  Yes, it's a circular argument.  But somehow fooled the world. (Well not somehow, with the blanket support of mainstream media.)