# What is the politics of a spy organization?

<span style="font-weight: 400;">A good question is one where people don't want to give a straight answer. The stock answer, same as THE scientists', is: </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">no politics</span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span>

[Mike Burgess, Aus Spy Agency Chief:](https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/puzzling-scott-morrisons-china-spray-slammed-by-intelligence-experts/news-story/84fa9a055292486be177dd9288e9240a) *ASIO is apolitical, my staff are apolitical, they put their lives on the line to actually protect Australians and Australia from threats of security. I will leave the politics to the politicians.*

<span style="font-weight: 400;">97.3% identical to what we've heard from countless scientists - we are </span>

*<span style="font-weight: 400;"> - above politics</span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;"> -</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Trouble is: it’s this </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">aboveness </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">that worries me. </span>

**Exhibit A:**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> Mueller’s bungling 7-year investigation/cover-up of Anthrax's origin which succeeded in protecting </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">scientist culture gone mad</span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;"> instead of exposing it.</span>

**Exhibit B:**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> The </span>[*<span style="font-weight: 400;">non-decision</span>* ](https://www.reuters.com/world/us-intelligence-releases-report-covid-19-origins-2021-10-29/)<span style="font-weight: 400;">by the US’s top Intelligence agencies re Covid's origin - where they told us the origin </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">may never be found</span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;"> - though we’re not allowed to see the evidence they looked at - or didn't. We don’t even know if they’ve grilled the chief suspects.   
</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The security organizations are singing from the </span>[<span style="font-weight: 400;">same songsheet</span>](http://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=2447)<span style="font-weight: 400;"> from which WHO investigators Daszak and Dwyer delivered their command performances. *Time is on our side. Keep obfuscating - years will pass - by then we'll be onto The Next Disease X - we'll be home-free.*</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Below is an exercise in stating the obvious - but so was saying Covid may have leaked from the </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">right-next-door </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">lab GoFFing-out deadly bat viruses - or saying world-leading expert/WHO investigator Pete </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dazza </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Daszak was dodgy - so it’s worth setting down:</span>

**A secret security organization:**

- <span style="font-weight: 400;">’s mission is to guard National Security - identify/combat threats - maintain/expand the established power structure - </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">the Order.</span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">  
    </span>
- <span style="font-weight: 400;">is a public service career job. The Great Un-elected. They watch politicians </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">cycle </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">through. (Robert Mueller the 3rd’s reign, for example, ran since he became Director of the FBI on </span>[<span style="font-weight: 400;">Sep 4 2001</span>](https://www.fbi.gov/history/directors/robert-s-mueller-iii)<span style="font-weight: 400;">!!!)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">  
    </span>
- <span style="font-weight: 400;">pays good. Great at the top. Massive budget - </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">from your taxes.   
    </span>
- <span style="font-weight: 400;">is an international network of intelligence gathering agents (spies)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">  
    </span>
- <span style="font-weight: 400;">collects/analyses/algorithms globo-data - for surveillance - to maintain order.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">  
    </span>
- <span style="font-weight: 400;">is powerful.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">  
    </span>
- <span style="font-weight: 400;">requires alliances with powerful international monied-organizations - including bio-defense/weapons research - whilst keeping tabs on/back-channeling with non-aligned nations.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">  
    </span>
- <span style="font-weight: 400;">is global by nature.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">  
    </span>
- <span style="font-weight: 400;">entails a concept of </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">the common-good</span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">. It’s actors are dedicated to uphold that - to keep us secure</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">  
    </span>
- <span style="font-weight: 400;">can’t divulge details of its operations to protect this </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">common-good </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">- or define what the </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">common-good</span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;"> means - due to National Security.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">This last one is the Catch-22 politics at the heart of every National Security organization:</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">We are empowered to act covertly to secure the common-good.</span>

**FAQ:** <span style="font-weight: 400;">But who defines the common good?</span>

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">This section has been closed due to the common good. Thank you.</span>*

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Which is where we get to the *no evidence is evidence* part.</span>

**Here's my conspiracy theory:**

<span style="font-weight: 400;">(a) Wellcome Trust - &amp;/+ Bill&amp;Melinda - tick all the above boxes (only difference is they have a private endowment) thereby qualifying as Private Security/Scio-tech Organizations. You could throw EcoHealth Alliance in there as well, they are private scio-security players, though 90% government funded. Also not nearly in the same league as Wellcome/Bill&amp;Melinda financially.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">(b) Undercover of the night, there has been a political alignment between private security operations such as Wellcome - and normal ones - including those of China and the US. They are all focused on *Global Security* to together fight anti-globalism - which they view as a common enemy. *If you're an enemy of my enemy ...*  
</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">(c) The above parties conspired to cover-up the origin of Covid. Not easy to do - unless you happen to be at the helm of the Science/Security/One-Everything Alliance - 20 years on from its 911/Anthrax mega-growth spurt to the frightening mass of unaccountable power/money it is today...  
</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">(d) Motive: save Globalization from the crippling blowback that would result from the truth: One Health scientists, our saviours, ***caused*** Covid. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">(e) Covid was then *used* - to permanently entrench a bio-state stranglehold. Due to Covid. Yes, it's a circular argument. But somehow fooled the world. (Well not *somehow*, with the blanket support of mainstream media.)  
</span>