What is the politics of a spy organization?

A good question is one where it’s hard to know the answer - coz - it’s a spy organization. The stock answer, same as the scientists', is: no politics - we are 

   -   above politics   -

But it’s this aboveness that worries me. 

Exhibit A: Mueller’s bungling 7-year investigation/cover-up of Anthrax's origin which succeeded in protecting scientist culture gone mad instead of exposing it.

Exhibit B: The non-decision by the US’s top Intelligence agencies re Covid's origin  - where they told us the origin may never be found - though we’re not allowed to see the evidence they looked at. We don’t even know if they’ve grilled the chief suspects.

It’s the same songsheet as WHO investigators Daszak and Dwyer have been singing from all along. They know time is on their side. Keep obfuscating - years will pass - by then we'll be onto The Next Disease X.  Once that happens we're home free.

Below is an exercise in stating the obvious - but so was saying Covid may have leaked from the right-next-door lab that was GoFing-out deadly bat viruses - or saying WHO investigator Pete Dazza Daszak was a charlatan - so it’s worth setting down:

A secret security organization: 

• ’s mission is to guard National Security - identify/combat threats -  maintain/expand the established power structure - the Order.
  
• is a public service career job. The Great Un-elected. They watch politicians cycle through. (Robert Mueller the 3rd’s reign, for example, ran since he became Director of the FBI on Sep 4 2001.)
  
• pays good. Great at the top. Massive budget. (This money comes from your taxes. EcoHealth was 91% bankrolled by govt.)
• is an international network of spies.
  
• collects/analyses/algorithyms globo-data - for surveillance - to maintain order.
  
• is powerful.
  
• requires alliances with powerful international monied-organizations -  including bio-defense/weapons research  - whilst keeping tabs on/back-channeling with the rest.
  
• is global by nature.
  
• entails a concept of the common-good. It’s actors are dedicated to uphold that - to keep us secure
  
• can’t divulge details of its operations to protect this common-good - or define what the common-good means - due to National Security.

This last one is the fundamental Catch-22 politics that lies at the heart of every National Security organization:

We are empowered to act covertly to secure the common-good.

FAQ: But who defines the common good?

This section has been closed due to the common good. Thank you.

Which is where we get to the no evidence is evidence part.

My argument is:

(a) Wellcome Trust  - & Bill&Melinda - tick all the above boxes (only difference is they have a private endowment) thereby qualifying as Private Security Organizations. You could throw EcoHealth Alliance in there as well, though they are government funded, and not nearly in the same league as Wellcome/Bill&Melinda financially.

(b) Undercover of the night, there has been a political alignment between private security operations such as Wellcome - and normal ones - including those of China and the US.  They are all focused on Global Security to together fight anti-globalism - which they view as their common enemy.

(c) They colluded to cover-up the origin of Covid - which was caused by this same partnership of Science/Security - after it grew to a frightening mass of unaccountable power/money in the aftermath of 911/Anthrax.

(d) Their motive was to save Globalization from the blowback that would result from knowledge that One Health scientists, our saviours, caused Covid. Then use Covid to permanently entrench a bio-state stranglehold.