Baroness Eliza Manningham-Buller

Wellcome Website, Oct 1, 2015: Baroness Manningham-Buller is the first woman to chair the Wellcome Trust’s Board of Governors, and was appointed following an open recruitment process.  She was previously a Governor of the Wellcome Trust.

2015 - that’s two years after Sir Jeremy, took over as Director.  Sir Jeremy was, of course, appointed by the Board of Governors, on which Baroness Eliza was already an influential figure. Hopefully the open recruitment process was more open than your inquiry into bullying under yours & Manningham-Buller’s watch, Jeremy?  Or similar?   Forget about that - so what made you go for the Baroness - in all openness?

Wellcome: Between 2002 and 2007, Eliza Manningham-Buller was Director-General of the UK Security Service (MI5), and led the service through significant change.

Oh. 

Baroness Manningham-Buller:  I am excited by the prospect of working even more closely with the Trust’s director, Jeremy Farrar .. to plan an even more ambitious future for our work.

Two points:

1. Yeah, I bet you're excited.  You'd be licking-your-lips at joining forces with sleuthy Jeremy.  If global human data is currency,  which it is, Wellcome's data-base is gold-mine.   Ex-Heads-of-MI5 don't change careers in their power-prime, go off, raise bees/chooks on an off-grid, self-sustaining plot ...  communing with nature ...  That's not exciting.  What's exciting is globalizing your power-cache.  Cashey-ing-the-fuck-in.    Trade-on ... trade-up.   Entrench your positions/images pokemon-style - until death ... we still don't part actually - aka legacy thinking ... we die but we/our organization's thought-culture lives on.  What we stood for.  This, in turn, if you do it right, will protect our image after death.  Understanding that that's how it works in the real world.  Enjoying the full pleasures life has to offer - at the top -  whilst making the big-decisions on behalf of humanity as your day-job .  Being a Player at that scale of influence ...  That's the kinda excitement that gets you out of bed everyday.

2. What; the fuck does even more ambitious future for our work entail ..., exactly? 

Bear in mind what we're talking about here:  big-picture global security Big-Wig   -    meets: Sir Jeremy:    globalist totalitarian regime advocate visionary - current custodian of mass-global-bio-data - gene-tech flag-bearer. 

That's a match made in heaven.  Here we have two people who understand that THE Future, which is what they spend their time/our money thinking about shaping.  This Future transcends all borders ... i.e Globalism ... One-Everythingism.

As a sociologist, i can report the only way that works is through global-totalitarianism.  I don't care what mad ideas of grandeur you have - that fails the beyond-the-pale test by a long way.  Coz: philosophically, there's no come back from there for human rights.

Deduction:  It's a power-grab.  Grab is not the right word.  Can't grab what you've already got-hold-off.   More like a booster-shot - sorry - mixed metaphors - let's stick with grip - as in wrestling, you had an advantages grip , you capitalized on that, drove that shit home. 

In this case, that shit = futurist vision

Entailing: AI x bio-data x gene-therapy - the dawning of the Hybrid-Era.   You don't need a 50 year crystal-ball to know that the way it's going -but you do need power in order to ride it, shape it, control it.  Luckily, that's exactly what Dame Eliza & Sir Jeremy have got cooking.

Which brings me back to the thought i can't shake.  Covid was such an enormous win for THE Science (Jeremy, Eliza, Fauci, et al), was it really only a coincidence?  We know WIV's location & the origin outbreak location was not a coincidence - not even the fab-5 Prox-O authors, that told the world it was a coincidence, thought that - so was the money bonanza  Covid uncorked a coincidence? 

Or is like it was with Anthrax, a deliberate release by scientists to get more power/money for vaccine research/global bio-security-surveillance?

You can't argue that it wasn't tremendously favourable for THE Science actors - that's powerful motive for a deliberate release ploy - which has been successfully done before with Anthrax. 

At the very least, we can acknowledge that it's a card-in-the-pack, that our visionaries, Jeremy & Eliza, have the power to play:

ring-a-ring-a-rosie - pocket full of posies - achoo - achoo - we all fall down

 

 

As usual, Manningham-Buller was full of the terrorists-under-every-rock PR-push

Her time in charge of MI5 coincided with a funding-explosion for security ops in the UK.

Intelligence & Security Committee, 2003-4 Annual Report: Since the end of the Cold War, the demands on the intelligence and security Agencies have changed significantly: the threats have become more numerous and varied.

What rubbish.  The drumming-up of terrorist threats/funding have become more numerous and varied - real threats have demonstrably decreased.   Unless you count the likes of Farrar, Manningham-Buller, Fauci - yeah, sure, using that metric they have increased.

Intelligence & Security:  Initially, there was a belief, now recognised as misplaced (by whom, you? With your money/influence COIs?) that this was an opportunity to reduce the Agencies (and the Armed Forces) as the threat was seen to have
diminished.  (I&S's brackets)

This hints at the Anthrax action.  There was a period of time, right about then, where pressure/common-sense was mounting to dial back the ridiculous levels of Intelligence & Security exemplified by McArthyism - an out of control, unaccountable, deep-state empire with totalitarian ambitions.   That sensible scale-back all collapsed along with 911 twin towers & then the Anthrax Terrorist Attacks.  Anthrax we know for sure was an internal science-community crime - specifically designed to reverse the decline in funding for bio-terrorism security.  A goal it achieved in spades.

But, in a world no longer dominated by opposing super powers, new threats emerged, such as terrorism inspired by Islamic extremism, and organised crime increased considerably.

The new threat is the lack of opposition amongst super powers.  Now that they're all on the same globalist page, the threat is the combined might of that super-power force versus the individual's freedoms

Meanwhile, old threats, such as espionage, remained ever present.

Yeah, right.  You think real estate agents know how talk-up or down stuff - they've got nothing on security actors trying to pump up their own paychecks. 

Terrorism is currently the biggest threat to the national security of the UK and its interests and the Agencies are operating in an extremely difficult and hostile environment.  As a result, we believe, of recognising that the scale of the threat had been under-
estimated, the Agencies reassessed the challenge presented by international terrorism to the national security of the UK and its interests. The result of this reassessment process in 2003 was to increase dramatically the size of the Security Service.

So, horse;s mouth, in case you think i'm making this up.  Pump-up the scare-campaign/threats volume - the result was to  increase dramatically the size of the Security Service - i.e: more dosh/influence

Manningham-Buller was a leader in (successfully) advocating for this funding-explosion for security/surveillance services at a time when it was stalling due to a lack of enemies to protect us against.

Stocktake: The head of MI5 chairing Wellcome Trust, which specializes in AI/Genomics and bio-data collection/surveillance in conjunction with the CCP - directed by Sir Jeremy Farrar - the chief architect of the Covid Conspiracy.

Hell.  Who-the-fuck-else they got running Wellcome?  

(spoiler: it gets murkier & murkier ...)