Fox in charge of the hen-house

The WHO Investigation, whichInvestigation pitches itself as the world's top-experts assiduouslyapplying workingtheir togetherpeerless intellect on behalf of the global-public (who is paying for them) to determine the Origin of Covid,Covid.  As they never tire of telling us, we're scientist, we take the politics out.  Fellow-WHO-investigator Dominic Dwyer puts it thus: 

Dominic Dwyer (Dec 2, 2020): As a doctor and a scientist, I think politics complicates getting the answers.  So I'd rather keep that aside. ..1:20: Our work as scientists is separate from politicians so we will try to leave the politics out.

They looked straight to the global-camera as they said this.  Traded on that sacred trust that they had from society:  we only follow the science - we only report what's true - we're above reproach

In fact: it is all an elaborate sham - of frightening proportions. 

We know that because:

• the representatives were all vetted by the CCP.
• many of them (including WHO boss, Tedros) are on record as praising the CCP, saying China’s commitment to transparency is .. impressive, and beyond words - an obvious lie,non-truth, easily disprovable
• many of themthe investigators have ruled out a lab-origin even before the investigation has begunbegun!
• many of them are up-to-their-eyeballs in CCP COIs - you don't commit this level of academic fraud for no reason

After putting Sir Richard in his place, you, as a full-time Twitter anti-investigation investigator activist, also took issue with NIH Directordirector, Francis Collins.  Now, Collins is no natural-origin skeptic , not by a long-shot - he was a key figure in the Feb 1 Teleconference that cooked-up the global cover-up strategy (to cover your monumental Celebrity Scientist Fuck-Up) in the first place.  But when Francis started gettingshitting nervoushis &pants (one of the first), began making some subtle arse-covering statements, you were all over himhis arse like a rash.  For example, this exchange:

Collins:  Whether [the coronavirus] could have been in some way isolated and studied in this laboratory in Wuhan, we have no way of knowing.

Daszak (May 29, 2020):  Disappointing! @NIHDirector clearly doesn't understand the weight of his words on this conspiracy-ladened issue.  It's simply not enough to say that you cannot rule out a lab-origin. We need leadership at this point, not scientific hesitancy.

(Luckily we have your leadership as a non-hesitant CCP-stooge/WHO investigator to shut down the possibility of a lab leak without investigating it.it!)

Conspiracy theories rely on the inability to prove a negative. We need the leader of our Nation's biomedical research agency to challenge conspiracy theorists & at the very least mention the TOTAL LACK OF EVIDENCE for it originating in a lab!"

First point, the statement that Covid may have originated in a lab - and must be investigated - is not a negative Pete - it’s a positive statement.  Saying Scientists KNOW Covid wasn't manmade - your headline - that's a negative.  What the hell did they teach you there at Bangor University?

Secondly, both the positive & the negative could easily be provedproved, but you’re blocking all attempts to gather evidence with your leadership.    Golden TurnRule #2 No evidence is  evidence (of a cover-up).  You can't turn the WIVdata-base databaseoff backthen onshout forat at your interrogators: there's a startTOTAL -LACK weOF could prove whether WIV held Covid prior to the outbreak in Wuhan, one way or another, by as early as this afternoon.  The fact that that won't happen is EVIDENCE that the origin is being covered-up.
EVIDENCE!

Thirdly, can you give the Conspiracy Theorist name-calling a rest, Pete?   It only draws attention to your insecurities.

Speaking of which, the pertinent question arising from this analysis of your CCP-spokesperson performance is:  Why?  Why stick your CelebrityScienceAlliance-neck out so far to protect a totalitarian regime?regime?

Vested interest is the bat-shit obvious answer - but how vested?

If we go back to the Golden Rule,Rule #1: emotive language = insecurity, then the volume of emotive language indicates athe degree of insecurityinsecurity.   On the Richter-scale that positions you&your org, EcoHealth Alliance right at the centre of the Covid cover-up.   Smack-bang Intointo causal territory.

We know EcoHealth Alliance & WIV were deeply entwined by the number of collaborations they were involved in over 15 years,year period, coz you told usus.   - soSo if Covid does have a lab-origin, then it's highly highly-likely that it was engineered by this Bat Pack collective.collective.  That would make you/your org the source of the greatest global-health disaster since the Black Plague. 

That's a lot of death, Pete.  If you did cause it, then covered it up, when coming clean at the beginning would have made all the difference, then that makes you personally responsible for the greatest mass-man-slaughter in the history of humanity. 

Luckily, you've implicated the entire THE Science Community in this atrocity, which has provided you with powerful backing in your cover-up endeavors in order to protect their wider interests.   But when/if the trials come, Pete, you've got sacrificial-lamb written all over you.  

(Daszak's shenanigans continue here.)