Fox in charge of the hen-house
The WHO Investigation, which pitches itself as the world's top-experts assiduously working together on behalf of the global-public (who is paying for them) to determine the Origin of Covid, is an elaborate sham of frightening proportions.
We know that because:
- the representatives were all vetted by the CCP.
- many of them (including WHO boss, Tedros) are on record as praising the CCP, saying China’s commitment to transparency is .. impressive, and beyond words - an obvious lie, easily disprovable
- many of them have ruled out a lab-origin even before the investigation has begun
After putting Sir Richard in his place, you, as a full-time Twitter anti-investigation investigator activist, also took issue with NIH Director Francis Collins. Now, Collins is no natural-origin skeptic , not by a long-shot - he was a key figure in the Feb 1 Teleconference that cooked-up the global cover-up strategy in the first place. But when Francis started getting nervous & began making some subtle arse-covering statements, you were all over him like a rash. For example, this exchange:
Collins: Whether [the coronavirus] could have been in some way isolated and studied in this laboratory in Wuhan, we have no way of knowing.
Daszak (May 29, 2020): Disappointing! @NIHDirector clearly doesn't understand the weight of his words on this conspiracy-ladened issue. It's simply not enough to say that you cannot rule out a lab-origin. We need leadership at this point, not scientific hesitancy.
(Luckily we have your leadership as a WHO investigator to shut down the possibility of a lab leak without investigating it.)
Conspiracy theories rely on the inability to prove a negative. We need the leader of our Nation's biomedical research agency to challenge conspiracy theorists & at the very least mention the TOTAL LACK OF EVIDENCE for it originating in a lab!"
First point, the statement that Covid may have "originated in a lab"lab - and shouldmust be investigated - is not a negative Pete - it’s a positive statement. Saying it Scientists KNOW Covid wasn't manmade - your headline - that's a negative.negative. What the hell did they teach you there at Bangor University?
Secondly, both the positive & the negative could easily be proved but you’re blocking all attempts to gather evidence with your leadership. Turn the WIV database back on for a start - we could prove whether WIV held Covid prior to the outbreak in Wuhan, one way or another, by as early as this afternoon. The fact that that won't happen is EVIDENCE that the origin is being covered-up.
Thirdly, howcan muchyou bonus doesgive the CCP pay you per sentence for saying ‘Conspiracy Theorist’?Theorist It’s name-calling -a itrest, Pete? It only draws attention to your insecurities.
Speaking of which, the pertinent question arising from this analysis of your CCP-spokesperson performance is: Why? Why stick your neck out so far to protect a totalitarian regime?
Vested interest is the obvious answer - but how vested?
If we go back to the Golden Rule, emotive language = insecurity, then the volume of emotive language indicates a degree of insecurity that positions you right at the centre of the Covid cover-up. Into causal territory.
We know EcoHealth Alliance & WIV were deeply entwined by the number of collaborations they were involved in over 15 years, coz you told us - so if Covid does have a lab-origin, then it's highly likely that it was engineered by this Bat Pack collective. That would make you/your org the source of the greatest global-health disaster since the Black Plague.
That's a lot of death, Pete. If you did cause it, then covered it up, when coming clean at the beginning would have made all the difference, then that makes you personally responsible for the greatest mass-man-slaughter in the history of humanity.
Luckily, you've implicated the entire THE Science Community in this atrocity, which has provided you with powerful backing in your cover-up endeavors in order to protect their wider interests. But when/if the trials come, Pete, you've got sacrificial-lamb written all over you.
(Daszak's shenanigans continue here.)