Fox in charge of the hen-house

The WHO Investigation, which pitches itself as the world's top-experts assiduously working together on behalf of the global-public (who is paying for them) to determine the Origin of Covid, is an elaborate sham of frightening proportions. 

We know that because:

• the representatives were all vetted by the CCP.
• many of them (including WHO boss, Tedros) are on record as praising the CCPCCP, forsaying beingChina’s commitment to transparencyopen &is transparent.. impressive, and beyond words - an obvious lie, easily disprovable
• many of them have ruled out a lab-origin even before the investigation has begun

 

After putting Sir Richard in his place, youyou, as a full-time Twitter anti-investigation investigator activist, also buttedtook headsissue with NIH Director Francis Collins,Collins. who Now, Collins is no natural-origin skeptic , not by a long-shot - he was a key figure in the daredFeb to1 sayTeleconference: that cooked-up the global cover-up strategy in the first place.  But when Francis started getting nervous & began making some subtle arse-covering statements, you were all over him like a rash.  For example, this exchange: 

Collins:“  Whether [the coronavirus] could have been in some way isolated and studied in this laboratory in Wuhan, we have no way of knowing.”

ThatDaszak sounds like a tepid statement of the bleeding obvious, but it still infuriated you. As a full-time Twitter anti-investigation activist you wrote (May 29, 2020):

 

 “Disappointing! @NIHDirector clearly doesn't understand the weight of his words on this conspiracy-ladened issue.  It's simply not enough to say that you cannot rule out a lab-origin. We need leadership at this point, not scientific hesitancy.”

(Luckily we have your leadership as a WHO investigator to shut down the possibility of a lab leak without investigating it.)

“Conspiracy theories rely on the inability to prove a negative.negative. We need the leader of our Nation's biomedical research agency to challenge conspiracy theorists & at the very least mention the TOTAL LACK OF EVIDENCE for it originating in a lab!"

First point, the statement that Covid may have "originated in a lab" - and should be investigated - is not a negative Pete - it’s a positive statement.  Saying it Scientists KNOW Covid didn’wasn't escapemanmade from- ayour labheadline is- that's a negative.  What the hell did they teach you there at Bangor University? 

Secondly, both the only reason we don’t have sufficient evidence to prove this positive is& thatthe negative could easily be proved but you’re blocking anyall attempts to gather itevidence with your ‘leadership’leadership.  Turn the WIV database back on for a start - we could prove whether WIV held Covid prior to the outbreak in Wuhan, one way or another, by as early as this afternoon. 

Thirdly, how much bonus does the CCP pay you a bonus per sentence for saying ‘Conspiracy Theorist’?   It’s name-calling - it draws attention to your insecurities.

(Daszak's shenanigans continue here.)