Hatching the plan
(work in progress)
The Jan 2020 Meetings would set the One Science lie in motion. So what were the contents?
Firstly, it wasn't a single meeting, it was a 3-day retreat.
Key points:
Day 1: Fact Finding presentations. What happened? What do we know - what do we not know?
This is pivotal to how future discussions would have gone.
Scenario A:
WIV was a homegrown GoF event. Involving international partners EHA,
Action: Go into full cover-up mode. Wild animal, possibly imported. The Americans did it with Anthrax. Do that. Our international partners will sell it their end
Which was what we saw. Seems likely.
Scenario B:
WIV was working closely with US/Singapore/German/French labs, so it's possible a foreign scientist carried it in. Danielle Anderson was the last foreigner at WIV, right at the time SARS-2 is estimated to have originated. Did she carry it in as an asymptomatic/mild carriercarrier? -
Scenario not. C:
Was it engineered outside China, by Baric, then smuggled into WIV by an international scientist, say a Daszak? Knowledge of this GoF breakthrough was being rumoured through a closed-circle of virology/vaxology cohorters. Problem wasis we can't do anything with it here due to over-regulation, but trust me,me ... this is big.
This would explain a few things. WIV is complicit, but not the source of the leak - could have been a stored at WIV - then passed out to a lower level lab.
Two of WIV's management say
Yuan Zhiming: I want to emphasize that .... the Wuhan Institute of Virology has never designed, made or leaked the novel coronavirus.
Wang Yanyi (vid, 2:23): It's certainly impossible the virus was made by, or leaked by, the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
This is a slight windmill tilt, butbut, they both omit the word stored. Is that deliberate? We didn't make it or leak it, but were we storing it - smuggled in by the Bat Pack ... ?
Scenario D: The militaryMilitary games,Games: orIf it's a WIVquestionable coincidence that a super-contagious bat virus thatoriginated escapednext-door to the world's largest Bat Lab, then the Military Games happening around the same time it took off is also curious.
All of these scenarios would explain the co-ordinated response from WIVthe orexperts anotherthat Wuhanwe labsaw. -Which withhas heavyto foreignerbe involvementexplained onfirst by any theory.
What made the GoFhighly-paid side - hence the buy-in for cover-up - lacknetwork of enthusiasminternational world-leading expert scientists/journals betray every principle of science?
There must be a reason. They can't all be that stupid. Either way it's a major problem.
Day 2: Narrative consolidation - same as SARS - wuhan market - let the experts decide -
Day 3: Organization, mobilization of plan, Prox-O/Nature, Lancet Statement co-ordination, Feb 1 Teleconf, Tedros