One Health
by dulan drift, Wednesday, July 14, 2021, 14:42 - first published by formosa hut - thanks dan.
In essence, The Covid Atrocity was committed by individuals seeking to centralize power within their globalist Orgs. A key organizations at the heart of this is One Health.
Yes, normal vanity, greed, power hungriness motivates our celebrity scientistsCelebrity Scientist actors - but there’in terms of understanding how they came to betray every principle of ethics in their profession, it’s alsoimportant anto understand their ideological overlap with the CCP: they both love centralized, personalized bio-data.
They’ve seen the future (on our behalves) -& thisdecided isthat whatonly wea needglobal approach canto keep us safesafe, as a planet.. We warned you about Covid - now we need to prepare for the Next Disease X …
(Spoiler:Or so the story goes. For the record: Ebright & Hobson, were warning, way before Dazza,Daszak, that the Anthrax-funded GoF-craze was gonna lead to a pandemic.)
As Daszak/One Health says, logic and reason tells you this approach will: save untold millions of lives.
Which is precisely where empiricismempiricism,
- the scienceaka, -The
becomes illogical. This is why:
Global amassment of personalized bio/health-data,data (including DNA,DNA), in conjunction with the CCP, opens the door to political abuse. That’s humans & their Orgs for you. Like it or not -not, it’s
- part of the equation. -
It will affect the outcome.
But there’s no evidence for that!
Sure there is. Easy to find. Search the words genomic surveillance Uyghurs - see how you go … (or keep reading - we’ll delve into that later…)
Yeah - but - we’re taking the politics out!
Even if you were, which you’re not, that’s an admission you’re ignoring an integral piece of the puzzle.
Politics is involved in global biosurveillance.
If you’re weighing the long term effects -& not taking this into account -then: then:
stand-down
You're proceeding from a false premise - thereby - making a horribleterrible mistake - with catastrophic humanity-shaping consequences… (!)
The One Health Initiative is a good case-study.
One Health Initiative website: In April 2006, Dr. Laura H. Kahn [MD, MPH, MPP] published the CDC article, ‘Confronting Zoonoses, Linking Human and Veterinary Medicine’ which prompted Dr. Bruce Kaplan [DVM] to contact her. Together they started the One Health Initiative, and Dr. Thomas P. Monath [MD] joined them in March of 2007 to establish the OHI triumvirate The One Health Initiative: Team Aims and Activities | Duke One Health. (Duke - remember that name)
Princeton: (Laura Kahn) published Who’s in Charge? Leadership during epidemics, bioterror attacks, and other public health crises in 2009 with Praeger Security International. (terrorism security company). Her main point is CDC should assume command in a bioterrorism event.
So we’ve got a bioterrorism enthusiast & a Zoonati legend as founders of One Health.Health.
One Health Initiative website: The One Health Concept is .. a worldwide strategy for expanding interdisciplinary collaborations .. in health care for humans, animals and the environment.
The synergism achieved will advance health care for the 21st century and beyond by accelerating biomedical research discoveries.. (and) expeditiously expanding the scientific knowledge base .. (which will) save untold millions of lives in our present and future generations.
Great. Unless Covid was a lab-leak. In which case the:the world-wide synergism of accelerated biomedical research collaborations and expeditious expanding
- … cost … -
untold millions of lives in our present and future generations.
But let’s not pre-judge. Let's take a closer look at a One Health Initiative scheme in action before we reach any conclusions.