Skip to main content

Lancet Statement

 

The Lancet Statement:

 

Whatever anyone subsequently thought, heard, spoke, read, wrote, felt - in regard to Covid not being a lab-escape - its origin lies in these two documents. They are historical artefacts of the highest order.

Sir Jeremy Farrar was in-the-thick-of both of them. Calling the shots.

As Francis Collins says: Thanks for your leadership on this critical and sensitive issue.

If King Arthur of Genomics is thanking you for your leadership - in organizing the pivotal meeting on the response to the biggest catastrophe since WW2 -then you're in historically rarefied air. 

Released as a coordinated offensive, these two info-weapons were:

  • purpose-written to provide heavyweight global support for a joint scientists/CCP version of Covid.
  • mega-platformed by all science mags - to the exclusion of all else.
  • used by social media giants to ban subjects suggesting the virus may have been engineered in an Wuhan lab.
  • pumped-up with a saturation media push by our celebrity scientist/influencers to entrench natural origin/vilify the conspiracy theorists.

When it came to disseminating Covid misinformation and conjecture to the entirety of the planet - at the crucial time in the-history-of-everything - when the truth would have made all-the-difference - man - you guys hit humanity out of the park - into your own engineered parallel universe. 

I marvel at the audacity - the scale of deception - as much as the catastrophic consequences. 

Farrar - Lancet Statement 

The Lancet Statement: The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins. .. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.

We support the call from the Director-General of WHO (Teddy Bear) to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture.

We sign this statement in solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China .. We declare no competing interests.

When i read that first time (an eminent Aussie scientist i happen to know sent it to me - thinking i would sign it!), it blew me away. Straight off i knew the claims were patently false - easily disprovable - 3-move checkmate:

  • The Wuhan labs in question are state-run bio-defense facilities.
  • China is run by a totalitarian regime.
  • The idea that the CCP (or USAMRIID for that matter)  (and all those working under their rule in these labs) would be open and transparent is beyond stupid.

So what’s beyond stupid? 

      -    Corruption   -

Deduction tells you from the very beginning, it’s the only explanation. This is where you don't need to be a scientist to solve the origin of Covid - probably better if you're not - despite what you're constantly told. 

If 27 of the world's leading scientists are saying: a totalitarian regime is open and transparent - straight away that statement tells you the world's leading experts are lying. In a coordinated way.

Basic follow-up shows glaring COI’s  amongst the authors/signatories.

Then you ask: Why are they lying? 

The only answer is: Covid was a lab-exit that needs to be covered up - for the common good.  (or: our leading experts are incredibly stupid)

By using power to quash legitimate speculation we might be dealing with:

 an escaped, engineered super-bug from a bio-weapons/defense lab (!)

- knowledge that potentially would have shocked the world(!) into taking action to stop the international spread of the virus - these scientists have directly contributed to:

     -    the deaths of millions   -

whilst justifying extremist restrictions on

     -   basic human freedoms    -

That's atrocious behaviour. Those that wrote/signed/pedalled these documents, including Sir Jeremy, will go down in infamy - so long as humanity (then AI) shall exist ...

(unless they win of course - which they may very well do - in which case they'll be heroes - i doubt AI's gonna fall for it though)

 

 

 

Back to top