Skip to main content

I Spy

Wellcome website:  Wellcome is an independent global charitable foundation dedicated to improving health through research. Although the way we deliver our mission has evolved since 1936, science has always been at the heart of it.

Wellcome website: Henry Wellcome became a wealthy and prominent figure in the growth of the modern pharmaceutical industry. .. After his death in 1936 .. the company became the property of the newly formed Wellcome Trust.

Farrar (16:00): Sir Henry Wellcome (who formed, then sold out of GlaxoSmithKline) left his whole endowment to us uhhmm ..  he was one of the first people to put tea infusions into tablets - that's how the money was made and in the late 1980’s a visionary leader of Wellcome sold the company and created the independent foundation..

Independent.  Sounds nice - same as Bill&Melinda - but what does it really mean? Two closely aligned, super rich foundations controlling the purse strings on a corrupt/broken funding system - that has engineered - with no constraints - the bio-state we now find ourselves living in. They have become a law unto themselves - which in turn has become a law unto us.

Wellcome: Successful products included antivirals such as AZT, the first drug approved to treat HIV.

Watched Dallas Buyers Club again recently - worth a second viewing - don't know how accurate it is but AZT was portrayed as poison pushed by corrupt big-Pharma - which was simultaneously denying patients other remedies. Some eerie similarities to today.

Farrar (16:10): so we are in this incredibly privileged position of having our own endowment which is about 26  - ahr - 27 billion pounds .. and  ahr we are independent, we have our own governing board, ahr, so we have none of the constraints that we appreciate you have here (at NIH) - none of the constraints of shareholders - that is an amazing privilege to be the head of.

Wellcome:

  • 1995: Wellcome Plc is bought by Glaxo to form GlaxoWellcome, which later becomes GlaxoSmithKline
  • 1995: The Wellcome Trust – or now just Wellcome – has become an independent charitable foundation
  • (1995: Jeremy Farrar appointed to Vietnam - sponsored by Wellcome Trust) (my brackets)

 

Wellcome Trust is political - we know that coz Farrar told us - as Director of Wellcome he uses the bio-tech speaking circuit to rally the troops.

But is it an unofficial, independent international intelligence gathering organization with a global security agenda?

Has it crossed over? I'm arguing it has.

Some will be thinking: Well, he had a couple of good points in the beginning - but now he’s totally lost-the-plot. I'm out!

For those remaining: let's take a look anyway.

In an open and transparent investigation, the Golden Rule is: there are no rules about what can and can't be examined.

Wellcome Trust:

In many Asian, African, and South American countries, Wellcome (and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) would represent the main foreign organizations on the ground. (Interestingly, its in those continents, where, according to Wellcome's own poll (PDF, p53), that trust in scientists is rock-bottom with only 1 in 10 people saying they have a high trust. The low vax-rate in Africa, well under 10% in most countries, is not due to western hoarding, as we're led to believe - it's because Africans simply don't trust scientists - due to previous, bad experiences.)

If you are a spy, you don’t rock up - start spying - you need a cover-occupation. Theoretically at least, Wellcome would provide a vehicle for intelligence gathering - in terms of its international penetration - its massive resources, it’s data-centralization platform. 

As we saw with Anthrax (and long before that) Scientists have become accustomed to pulling up chairs at the National Security Councils of the world. 

If our current crop of Covid-scientists are not involved in Secret Security, then why are the emails redacted?

dack-the-redactions 

Hand it all the scientific correspondence over for that matter:  Farrar’s, Collins’s, Daszak’s, Lipkin’s etc - all of those scientists involved.  The meeting was a live call - it’ll be there in the cloud somewhere.  Let’s take a look at that!

Why not? You keep telling us it's science - not politics - so what are you afraid of? The truth?

Why doesn’t the taxpayer have a right to know the premise behind the actions decided on in that Feb 1 meeting - that changed the world.

If not now when? 

Wellcome

Back to top