Skip to main content

I Spy

Wellcome Trust is political -we know that - but is it an unofficialunofficial, independent international intelligence gathering organization?

Some people reading this will be thinking: Well, he had a couple of good points in the beginning - but now he’s totally lost-the-plot.

But let's take a look anyway ...

Wellcome:

  • has operations in over 100 countries

  • collects and centralizes data/intelligence
     - loves the stuff - knows it's the future
  • vigorously prosecutes a globalization agenda

  • promotes/employs bio-surveillance technology

  • funds/pursues dual-purpose defense/weapons genomics/AI technologies - in US, China, Africa - including research at WIV
  • is directed by Jeremy Farrar

In many Asian, African, and South American countries, Wellcome (and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) would represent the main foreign organizations on the ground

If you are a spy, you don’t rock up - start spying - you need a cover-occupation. Theoretically at least, Wellcome would provide a vehicle for intelligence gathering - in terms of its international penetration - its massive resources, it’s data-centralization platform

As we saw with Anthrax (and long before that) Scientists have become accustomed to pulling up chairs at the National Security Councils of the world. 

If our current crop of Covid-scientists are not involved in Secret Security, then why are the emails redacted?

dack-the-redactions 

Hand it all the scientific correspondence over for that matter:  Farrar’s, Collins’s, Daszak’s, Lipkin’s etc - all of those scientists involved.  The meeting was a live call - it’ll be there in the cloud somewhere.  Let’s take a look at that!

Why not? You keep telling us it's science - not politics - so what are you afraid of? The truth?

Why doesn’t the taxpayer have a right to know the premise behind the actions decided on in that Feb 1 meeting - that changed the world.

If not now when? 

 Wellcome