Skip to main content

Dack the Redactions

First principle of Covid: 

no evidence - is evidence

It’s evidence that the truth is being concealed in the well-founded hope that in 10 years time no-one will know or care about the origin. People will vaguely remember something about bats & pangolin - or was it civets? - there was some kind of conspiracy theorist questioning wasn’t there? - but then we moved on - in the end it was never really settled.

That’s a pity - coz tracing the origin is important. Even better it's:

easy

Despite what we're told. Dozens of people know for sure already. The only reason we don’t know is coz those that do know are withholding the information.

For example: the total redaction of what was discussed at the Feb 1 Teleconference (PDF, p3133) - where the fate of the world was decided by public-funded health officials - is a classic. Everyone on that call knows what happened. We could likely solve the origin of Covid simply by unredacting correspondence of those scientists who decreed the world's response to the outbreak. Why are their discussions - science discussions about a subject that affected us all - so secretive?

Ron Fouchier, the world’s top GoF-shot, wrote a 2-page bullet point review. Can we see that one?

 

Note: I’ve redacted another full page of redactions from Ron’s notes. You didn’t miss much. Except we did.

 

Or this one from Farrar? 

From : Jeremy Farrar

Sent : Sunday, February 2, 2020 4 :48 AM 

Below: Farrar to Feb 1 Teleconferencers. 

zaterdag 1 februari 2020 om 21:59

 

Yeah - no. Not reasonable, Jeremy.  Making secret plans for the world over the weekend about covering-up Covid - not telling what they were? 

We know you had thoughts and suggestions on this complex issue - you organized/chaired the discussion - let’s see them.

Why not? 

Due to keeping us secure on the planet

Here’s a thought and suggestion:

#dack-the-redactions

We have to keep remembering - for us it’s a big mystery - but it’s not for the actors.

So if our scientist actors are acting like members of a top-secret spy organization, what do we know about the politics of your typical National Security Organization? 

Not much. Except it exists.