Ch 5: Feb 1 Teleconference

Heavily redacted FOI emails from Fauci still reveal tantalizing details of how the cover-up went down - who the actors were for a start. Luckily, deduction also allows you to conclude 'no evidence' - is evidence.

FOI Emails: Farrar-Collins-Fauci

An FOI action launched/persisted with/won by Buzzfeed/Freedom of Information activists produced these gems. Brilliant work. Keep it up. 

But try googling the source of that effort for humankind - the first page is dominated by FactCheck* assuring us there’s nothing to see here. The actual sources have been shuffled out. Again, shows you the scale.

(*The lying done by FactCheck, PolitiFact's Pants On Fire or the WP’s Four Pinocchios etc - in our moment of need - is a thread in itself. One quick example: 

WP’s Glen Kessler: I fear @tedcruz missed the scientific animation in the video that shows how it is virtually impossible for this virus jump from the lab. Or the many interviews with actual scientists. We deal in facts, and viewers can judge for themselves.)

Sir Jeremy and Dr Collins are the directors of Wellcome Trust and NIH.

Fauci, as we know, is director of NIAID  - since 1984!  The Fouch must’ve read that book thought it was a How-to Manual - he’s been at NIAID a total 54 years!  Hard to get more deeply instated deep-state than that.) 

This Feb 2 email - a day after the Feb 1 Teleconference - captured the atmosphere of the early days of Covid - which captured the atmosphere of the early days of Antrhax:

From:Fauci, Anthony (NIH/NIAID) [E)

Sent: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 17:13:03 +0000

To: Mark Dybul

Subject : RE: A connection to jake (Liang) (my brackets)

Mark:

Thanks for the note. Sorry that l had to cancel. This is White House in full overdrive and I am in the middle of it. Reminiscent of post -anthrax days. 

Best,

Tony

Reminiscent of post-anthrax days. Yeah - eerily so. Seeing how anthrax was also caused by bio-defense scientists. Must have been a mad-scramble to cover that up as well, right? 

Whilst in the middle of full-overdrive, Fauci lobbied for, then rode/controlled the explosion in biodefense funding and vaccine research/use - due to Anthrax - to fight bio-terrorism. 

David Franz, ex-Commander USAMRIID (p14-15): The NIAID annual budget for biosecurity was increased from essentially zero dollars to $1.7 billion after the anthrax letters in 2001.

Which, remember, was perpetrated by US scientist(s) - who wanted to increase biodefense funding/power and vaccine research/use.

So it’s cool to get an insight into Fauci’s the buck stops power nexus through his FOI emails. The global health big boys. Fauci, Collins - they’re the God Fathers of GoF/Genomics - respectively. 

Farrar is their One-Health love-child.

A secession - like Socrates-Plato-Aristotle’s pursuit of the truth - except a dastardly version.

Researching Covid - it’s an endless flow spewed out from a system-gone-wrong. Way more than you could ever collate in a bunch of lifetimes. You get swept along by it - record what you can as you go...

At some point though, you’ve gotta start swimming upstream.

See who lives up there.

The emails show: Sir Jeremey Farrar was calling the shots. Brackets are mine unless stated. All emails from this ref, uploaded by Dan. Thanks to Buzzfeed.  -

Note: Have redacted the redactions - there were a lot. Included some later for analysis.

Jan 31: Looks Engineered


From: Kristian G. Andersen 

Sent : Friday, January 31, 2020 10:32 PM

To: Fauci, Anthony (NIH/NIAID)

Cc: Jeremy Farrar

Subject : Re: FW: Science: Mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak 's origins (Jon Cohen article - conspiracy theorist template)

 

Hi Tony,

Thanks for sharing. Yes, I saw this earlier today and both Eddie and myself are actually quoted in it . It's a great article, but the problem is that our phylogenetic analyses aren't able to answer whether the sequences are unusual at individual residues, except if they are completely off. On a phylogenetic tree the virus looks totally normal and the close clustering with bats suggest that bats serve as the reservoir .

The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered. (Andersen’s brackets)

We have a good team lined up to look very critically at this, so we should know much more at the end of the weekend . I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie (Holmes), Bob (Garry), Mike (Ferguson) (Wellcome Trust Governor), and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. 

But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change.

Best,

Kristian


Not sure the opinions changed privately but they changed 180 degrees publicly - literally overnight - when Kristian and Eddie delivered Prox O’s alternative truth option at the following day’s Teleconference - arguing a natural origin from bats via pangolin.





Feb 1 Teleconference

From: Jeremy Farrar

Sent: Sat, Feb 1, 2020 1:13 PM

To: Fauci, Anthony, Patrick Vallance

Cc: Christian Drosten, Marion Koopmans, R.A.M. Fouchier, Edward Holmes Andrew Rambaut, Kristian G. Andersen, Paul Schreier (CEO Wellcome, since Sep 2, 2019), Mike Ferguson, Francis Collins

Subject: Re: Teleconference

Kristen and Eddie have shared this and will talk through it on the call. Thank you.

Hope it will help frame the discussions.

(There was a lot of sharing/cheering of this Jan 31 Jon Cohen Science article which features Dasak, sets template for the conspiracy theorist vilification campaign - or was it the Prox O draft itself?)

 

From :Jeremy Farrar, 1 Feb 2020 at 15:34

Information and discussion is shared in total confidence and not to be

shared until agreement on next steps.

(Actually not to be shared - ever - discussion details have been redacted. Why?)

Dial in details attached.

Please mute phones.

I will be on email throughout - email Paul or I Paul (Schreier) if any problems

If you cannot make it, I will phone you afterwards to update.

(Wow! Sir Jeremy, you're all over it - in our moment of need...)

Agenda

(Prox O draft was completed that day - two of its authors are presenting. We can assume they presented their draft. Yesterday, literally,  the authors confirmed it  looks engineered. But we can’t have that - so - here’s the pangolin water-muddier plan? 

The next steps and desired outcomes were redacted. Reminds you that although we see this as an exciting mystery investigation - it's not a mystery for some people - it's a lived-experience. Luckily, Farrar provides a list of those real-life livers:)

(participants:

Paul and I  (both Wellcome Trust, Farrar - Oxford 1990’s. 

Paul Schreier, previously a public servant  adviser to PM (then Julia Gillard - current Wellcome Chair, since 2020) & Cabinet - Executive Coordinator (Strategic Policy and Implementation), most recently CEO of Hakluyt (2016-19), a shadowy British strategic intelligence firm)

Kristian Anderson (Prox O lead-author, Scripps)

Bob Garry (Prox O, Tulane) - I have not been able to contact Bob. Please forward if you can. (Same here)

Christian Drosten (Lancet Statement/Germany’s Covid Tsar )

Tony Fauci (NIAID)

Mike Ferguson (Wellcome Trust Governor)

Ron Fouchier (H5N1 GoF pioneer!)

Eddie Holmes (Prox O, first non-Chinese to be allowed access to Covid’s sequence, Oxford/Wellcome 1990’s)

Marion Koopmans (WHO investigator/extremely unlikely lab-origin extremist)

Stefan Pohlmann (Lancet Statement)

Andrew Rambaut (futurist, Prox O, 2nd non-Chinese person to know sequence, Oxford/Nuffield Dept 1990’s, Wellcome funded through VIZIONS, bio-surveillance enthusiast)

(Old-fashioned man's world at the top - except for Koopmans)

 

 

 

Tedros Calls

From: Francis Collins, 1 Feb, 2020, 20:50

To : Jeremy Farrar, Cc: "Fauci, Anthony

Re: Teleconference (with Tedros - ducks-in-a-row exercise)

Hi Jeremy,

I can make myself available at any time 24/7 for the call with Tedros. Just let me know. Thanks for your leadership on this critical and sensitive issue.

Francis

 

From: Fauci, Anthony (NIH/NIAIO) 1 Feb 2020, 22:06:26 +0000 (=22:06:26)

To: Jeremy Farrar;Collins, Francis

RE: Teleconference

Thanks, Jeremy. We really appreciate what you are doing here. Pleasure to work with you.

Best, Tony

 

What Farrar was doing here was:

taking the lead

on behalf of the planet

Fauci is a Scio-politics Hall-of-Famer - but he’s 80 years old.  Francis is no spring chicken either. 

Jeremy is 60 - in his prime. Time to assume the role of top-dog. What better way to do that than step-up in a crisis by convening strategy with the Prox Origin authors/Lancet Statement signers - and getting Tedros onboard - for the critical and sensitive issue of covering up the origin of Covid.

 

From: Jeremy Farrar, Feb 1, 2020 4:00 PM (UK-time?)

To: Collins, Francis Cc: Fauci, Anthony

We are altogether as you know! .. (A)lways great working with you both.

 

From: Jeremy Farrar

Sent : Feb 2, 2020 11:28 AM

To: Fauci, Anthony, Collins, Francis Cc: Tabak, Lawrence (NIH deputy-director)

Tedros and Bernhard (Schwartländer) have apparently gone into conclave .... they need to decide today in my view. If they do prevaricate, I would appreciate a call with you later tonight or tomorrow to think how we might take forward.

Decide what? Take what forward? All redacted. It’s there - but redacted.

So we have to speculate - whether we like it or not. Was Tedros hesitant to join the Prox O cover-story? 

Luckily Tedros & Bernhard didn’t prevaricate too much - not sure why there was concern - Tedros was already praising the CCP to high-heaven on Jan 29. Knowing Tedros, he's a slippery guy - may have been nervous about getting locked-in to the pangolin/wet market origin story so early in the piece. 

Why would you do that?

 

From: Francis Collins

Date: 2 Feb, 2020 at 10:27

To: Jeremy Farrar Cc: Fauci, Anthony, Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD)

Jeremy,

I'm available any time today except 3:15 - 5:45 pm EST (on a plane) for a call to Tedros. Let me know if I can help get through his thicket of protectors.

Francis

Yeah - got any tips, Francis, on how to get through your thicket of protectors - comprising mass-media/cyber industry/the science community/99% of politicians?

Inside the Feb 1 Teleconference

by dulan drift, Tuesday, August 17, 2021, 07:45

 

Inside the infamous Feb 1 teleconference - some colorful characters were online.

You think Fauci is bad - there was also Fouchier, the controversial GoF evangelist who souped-up bird flu. Reminds you -Genomics & GoF - go hand-in-hand.  Eddie Everywhere was there of course, Andersen, Dresden, Koopmans.

One day i want to recreate the dialogue from that meeting, but more than that, i want to get this thread finished - out of my head. Here’s the thrust coming from Farrar who chaired:

Whatever we say here is classified. We need to speak openly to make the right decisions. To speak openly, we need to know that this discussion will remain strictly confidential. If you’re uncomfortable with that then you should leave this call. (nobody leaves)
Good. So yes, it looks like it was engineered - in WIV - probably.  I just can't figure out how this gets accomplished in nature. Sorry to say. 

Then it gets worse.  NIH funded EcoHealth GoF at WIV. 

Given the climate of anti-science/globalism that already exists, that I’ve been warning about, that spells death to all our One Health genomic GoF visions/funding - everything we’ve all worked so hard for... 

The End.

Or...

We pivot

Positives: If you forget about the real origin for a minute, this virus is exactly what we have been predicting, preparing for.  It is still the perfect plat-storm to demonstrate/execute our One Health dream.  We can make this disruption work for us.  One non-Truth. One Health. One Planet.  We still sail the rising tide - turn it to advantage - for the common-good. But it’s now or never...

As scientists, leaders, we accept the heavy burden of responsibility. It is our job to see the big-picture. To weigh the inputs - then make the tough decision that will affect not only the future of science, but the path of humanity. 

All in favour say ‘Aye’.   (Unanimous 'Aye')

FAQ: But what if we get caught?

Ans: (powered by FatCheck.global.con): By whom?  haha  We have Big-Everything on our side  - worked fine all the other times.



 

Feb 1-2 Teleconferences - Outcomes

The first thing to note is that after the Feb 1 Teleconference it seems everybody was in agreement that a lab-exit from Wuhan was the most likely scenario. Andersen, Holmes, and Garry had concluded that it looks engineered, while Farrar noted that the virus appeared primed for human contagion.

Farrar:  A likely explanation (involves) accidently (sic) creating a virus that would be primed for rapid transmission between humans. 

That's an astounding admission from someone who would lead the charge to vilify the conspiracy theorists. Not only did Farrar think/know it had escaped from a lab - he thought it was  primed for rapid transmission between humans. 

Farrar: I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature.

Neither can I.  What Farrar did figure out though was how to accomplish the cover-up.

So what was the “agreement on the next steps” engineered by Farrar in those crucial meetings? Here's what we know:

Action: Launch Proximal Origin through Nature multiplied by Lancet Statement.

Goal: Present a united front work department of the world’s leading experts - to support the CCP’s version of the virus’s origin/save Genomics/One Health/WHO/NIH/ourselves.

Responsibility: Prox O: Farrar, Andersen, Holmes, Garry, Rambaut, Lipkin - Ian couldn’t be with us of course - he’s currently in China talking to Li Kechiang - so doing his bit. He’s agreed to come in as the Celebrity-Scientist salesman direct from his fact-hiding mission to China. He’ll be our public voice.

LanceS: Farrar, Koopmans with Daszak/EcoHealth

Note: Farrar/Fauci/Collins to liaise with Nature/Lancet/media re platforming

 

Action: Praise the CCP’s response/transparency

Goal: Shield CCP - and ourselves - to save One Health

Resp: Farrar, Lipkin, Daszak, Holmes, Andersen, WHO

 

Action: Vilify anyone asking questions as a crackpot conspiracy theorist - de-platform them.

Goal: Marginalize those looking to uncover the truth. Control the narrative.

Resp: All. Farrar/Fauci/Collins to liaise with media/big-tech owners re censoring.

 

Action: Say we want to take the politics out whilst praising CCP’s science-based approach. Emphasise the sovereign authority of the science - which we will control through PO and LS.

Goal: Remove any politics - except for our own

Resp: All. Fauci/Farrar/Lipkin will coordinate this tactic with CCP (Gao/KeChiang).

 

Action: Call for more funding, pump up fear of the Next Disease X. 

Goal: Get more money! Entrench.

Resp: WHO (Ryan), EcoHealth/Daszak,  Holmes, Lipkin (13:20)

 

Action: Focus on vaccine development as the cure

Goal: Boost our vaccine-focused industry - give us control of the solution.

Resp: Fauci, Farrar, Collins Drosten

 

Action: Downplay the severity of Covid. Say it’s not as bad as SARS/seasonal flu

Goal: ? *

Resp: (Lipkin, Koopmans, WHO)



Action: Advise (non-Chinese) people not to wear masks

Goal: ? *

Resp: (Farrar/SAGE, Fauci, Lipkin (TS32:30), Tedros/WHO)

 

Action: Keep borders with China open as long as possible

Goal: ? *

Resp: Farrar/SAGE, Fauci, WHO

 

Action: Distribute a Covid testing system - that we know doesn't work.

Goal: ?*

Resp: Collins/Fauci/NIH (TS:1:58)

* The last four intrigue me. If you wanted Covid to explode - that is exactly what you would do: It’s not serious, don’t wear masks, keep international travel pumping, introduce a useless test.

If making sure the Covid genie got out of the bottle was the plan, it worked a treat.

This adds a new level of potential culpability: it's one thing to activate a cover-up - to protect the One Health/CCP Genomics/GoF vision - but did our scientist MOU's deliberately make it worse in order to carpe diem that goal?

Interestingly, from very early on, the CCP’s official line was listen to the scientific experts. They’ve stuck to that pact consistently throughout. 

Liu Pengyu, US Chinese embassy: We have been supporting science-based efforts on origins tracing, and will continue to stay actively engaged. That said, we firmly oppose attempts to politicise this issue.

That indicates the above tactics were co-ordinated.

The fix was in from the beginning.