Hatching the plan

(work in progress) 
 The Jan 2020 Meetings would set the One Science lie in motion.  So what were the contents? 
 Firstly, it wasn't a single meeting, it was a 3-day retreat. 
 Key points: 
 Day 1: Fact Finding presentations.  What happened? What do we know - what do we not know? 
 This is pivotal to how future discussions would have gone. 
 Scenario A: 
 WIV was a homegrown GoF event.  Involving international partners EHA, 
 Action: Go into full cover-up mode. Wild animal, possibly imported.  The Americans did it with Anthrax.  Do that. Our international partners will  sell it their end  
 Which was what we saw. Seems likely. 
 Scenario B: 
 WIV was working closely with US/Singapore/German/French labs, so it's possible a foreign scientist carried it in.  Danielle Anderson was the last foreigner at WIV, right at the time SARS-2 is estimated to have originated.  Did she carry it in as an asymptomatic/mild carrier? 
 Scenario C: 
 Was it engineered outside China, by Baric, then smuggled into WIV by an international scientist , say a Daszak?  Knowledge of this GoF breakthrough was being rumoured through a closed-circle of virology/vaxology cohorters.  Problem is we can't do anything with it here due to over-regulation, but trust me ... this is big. 
 This would explain a few things.  WIV is complicit, but not the source of the leak - could have been a stored at WIV - then passed out to a lower level lab. 
 Two of WIV's management say 
 Yuan Zhiming:   I want to emphasize that .... the Wuhan Institute of Virology has never designed, made or leaked the novel coronavirus. 
 Wang Yanyi (vid, 2:23): It's certainly impossible the virus was made by, or leaked by, the Wuhan Institute of Virology.  
 This is a windmill tilt, but, they both omit the word stored.   Is that deliberate?  We didn't make it or leak it, but were we storing it - smuggled in by the Bat Pack ... ? 
 Scenario D: The Military Games: If it's a questionable coincidence that a super-contagious bat virus originated next-door to the world's largest Bat Lab, then the Military Games happening around the same time it took off is also curious. 
 All of these scenarios would explain the co-ordinated response from the experts that we saw. Which has to be explained first by any theory.  
 What made the highly-paid network of international world-leading expert scientists/journals betray every principle of science? 
 There must be a reason.  They can't all be that stupid.  Either way it's a major problem. 
   
 Day 2: Narrative consolidation - same as SARS - wuhan market - let the experts decide - 
 Day 3: Organization, mobilization of plan, Prox-O/Nature, Lancet Statement co-ordination, Feb 1 Teleconf, Tedros