# Sleeping with the Enemy

Covid showcased a frightening willingness by our top experts to betray every principle of science in order to protect a totalitarian regime. (paid for by you)

# In the Name of the Holy Science

Following the accumulation of a [mountain of evidence](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350887648_3_WUHAN_LABORATORIES_BAT_RESEARCH_AND_BIOSAFETY) by unpaid netizens, the fattest rats started jumping ship in Mar, 2021, a year after the event.

[Tedros](http://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=2488) went from: *China’s commitment to transparency and supporting other countries .. is.. impressive, and **beyond words***.

To:  
[(Mar31,2021)](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-30/who-chief-critiques-covid-report-says-lab-leak-study-needed) ***Although** the team has concluded that a laboratory leak is the least likely hypothesis, this requires **further investigation**.*   
In May, Ralph Baric, [GoF bat-virus WIV collaborator](https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985), engineer suspect, who'd supported WIV to the hilt, suddenly [released a statement](https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6543/694.1) saying:

*theories of accidental release from a lab .. remain viable.*

Fauci soon followed with his own [ratty qualifications](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fauci-not-convinced-covid-19-developed-naturally).

These subtle acknowledgements of the bleeding obvious sound innocuous, but they came off the back of a year of co-ordinated [vilification *by* scientists](http://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=2421) *of* scientists - for THE Science.

God help you if you were a *non-scientist*.

You were dismissed as irrelevant, outright BANNED by media from having any input into the seismic shift in humanity currently unfolding.

Rule 1: There is only one God - who's pronoun is the sovereign authority of Expertism on Everything (scientists)

Rule 2: See rule 1

*Existential threat* is an over-used media buzz-word - but - we've got a live one!

Our freedoms being permanently deleted by The X-perts - due to: a virus caused/covered-up by The X-perts. Crime of the Century happening in real time!

*But all we hear now is radio silence*\*

The Backflip Olympics happened around the time as the normal Olympics - but less widely covered.

Intriguingly, it came after Team WHO had completed their investigation on behalf of the world and mounted a mega-platformed campaign to sell it.

**Main point:** a lab-leak is [*extremely unlikely*](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55996728) and the X-perts had *[closed the lid](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55996728)* on it.

**Dr. Peter Ben Embarek**, WHO mission **head** declared, it was *"[not in the hypotheses](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55996728) that we will suggest for future studies"*.

All the others WHO-X-perts echoed those remarks

In other words, the lab-leak was dead to WHO. Move on.

As such, this subtle signalling from Tedros was actually a blaring betrayal for those who can translate Scio-pol expert-speak.

(Aside: Whatever you might think about Tedros, he’s a cunning old fuck - always survives - somehow - though his friends don’t. How on earth can someone who was [praising the CCP transparency to high-heaven](http://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=2488), who ensured Covid escaped into the world by advising against border closures - how can that person keep his public-funded job? Not only did he keep it, he was elected unopposed (!) for another term.)

Tedros's subtle signalling sent [shockwaves](https://youtu.be/WAJKC4I4cK8?t=5) through the scientific community, the media, and politicians. It precipitated a quiet rush of the experts trying to distance themselves - from themselves.

Paraphrase: *It’s not that we ever dismissed a lab-leak entirely - extremely unlikely doesn't mean impossible - we never said that - merely there was no evidence.*

(Edit: there are some more nuanced ones evolving now: *we were afraid - of political repercussions so we had to lie/play politics*. Same scientists who kept insisting they were *taking the politics out.*  Or - *the cover-up was caused by a [small group of scientists that managed to create a mass-illusion](https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1526704460260691969) that duped us all -* the so-called *dumb fkn idiot defense.)*

Caught in the precarious position of having to re-position, whilst desperately trying not to offend the CCP, or upset the Gravy Train, the X-perts pulled it off with aplomb. They were helped by a compliant media that banned publication of dissent.

# Cryptic Manner

Despite the exodus of sci-X-perts from the good-ship WIV, a few notables decided to hang tough with the CCP.

Double or nothing. To the bitter end.

This is not an exhaustive list - only from those Celebrity Scientists we’ve looked at:

Daszak (WIV/EcoHealth)

Holmes - Sydney Uni - Prox-O co-author

Andersen - Scripps - Prox-O lead-author

Linfa Wang\*

Dwyer (WHO/Westmead)

Nature (Mega-science platform)

That makes you wonder, what does the CCP have on these dudes? It can’t only be money. How do you get someone to say this:

[Dwyer:](https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/jan/16/at-the-coalface-what-the-australian-expert-in-whos-covid-mission-in-china-hopes-to-find) *Now **of course** it doesn’t mean that the outbreak actually started in Wuhan. .. It’s an easy assumption just to say, ‘It’s all in Wuhan’.* (AKA [Occam's Razor](http://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=2484)) *.. It could have been brought into Wuhan either from .. other parts of Asia, or indeed, [other parts of the world](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm8BZphBj1w). (2:45) ..(A) number of detailed studies need to be done to work out was the virus in Wuhan in an unknown manner or **cryptic manner** .. could it have been in other parts of the world?* (3:25)

*Cryptic manner* - that's a good one Dom. Strangely, i agree with you. GoF is a western technology imported into China. That's cryptic. Why on earth would we be teaching totalitarian regimes how to make bio-weapons?

In that sense, it's origin is *not* from China.

But was Covid physically made outside China then shipped/smuggled to Wuhan. Note: smuggling deadly viruses across borders, as crazy as it sounds, was common practice/knowledge amongst the international virology community:

[Kristian Andersen:](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC5210219/) *In <span style="font-weight: 400;">several cases, **international scientists** .. **transported**</span>* (ebola) <span style="font-weight: 400;">**samples**</span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;"> **back to their home countries for further research**, in many cases **without permission** **or knowledge** of the affected nations ([Heymann et al., 2016](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC5210219/#R6)).</span>*

Aka: smuggling

The Bat Pack are *international scientists.* Could have come from US, Aus, Singapore network very easily. Let's not rule that out.

It would help explain the scale of deceit. The lengths Dominic/WHO have gone to.

China has called for an [investigation of US bio-security practices](http://www.news.cn/english/2021-08/23/c_1310144102.htm) in any further WHO Investigation - good idea.

US *is* the home of GoF. Logical place to search. Search Aus/CSIRO/Syd Uni, Singapore while you're at it - all those cohorts were cahooting on making bat viruses (a) transmissible to humans (b) more deadly

<span style="font-weight: 400;">[Wang Wenbin, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson:](http://www.news.cn/english/2021-08/23/c_1310144102.htm) *I wonder when the United States plans to invite WHO experts to investigate the UNC bio-lab and USAMRIID? We suggest that the United States stop slinging mud at others and instead find out what happened in its own labs first.*</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hard to argue with that. Which explains the eerie silence from the US side.</span>

# The Wokey-Pokey

Disturbingly, some of the (very, very few) scientists who raised the possibility of a lab-event are now [the ones making excuses](https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1526704460260691969) for all their colleagues who took the money then sold the world out. The excuse: *they were afraid, the poor darlings.*

The gist is: *We would have told the truth to help save the world in its moment of need, but we couldn't, coz we were busy being a pack of craven cowards acting politically to protect our financial interests. But next time ....*

The Covid Atrocity runs deeper than [*a small group of scientists*](https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1526704460260691969). It's a brazen lie to say otherwise. Another Bait&amp;Switch by truth-adverse scientists - who - God forbid - be subjected to an investigation by outsiders.

The messaging is: *Everything is fine, WHO's fine, all the nice scientists who did nothing are fine ...*

*Ya put some Eelites in!*

*Ya take some Eelites out*

*Ya say - Mass-Illusion - then ya shake-it-all-about*

*Ya do the Wokey-Pokey then ya turn around ... !*

*That's what it's all about! (clap clap)*

Yeah-no.

The fact that not a single university or research organization on the planet spoke up when it mattered is *incontrovertible* evidence that THE Science culture is rotten to the core.

It cannot be fixed internally.

Any attempt to do so is: scientists acting politically to protect their highly-paid, unaccountable world - same as it ever was.

Science can be saved - but not by scientists. First stop is get the ethicists (philosophers/sociologists) in!

Explain to scientists what 'truth' means (spoiler: doesn't mean *license-to-lie* coz of my self-serving idea of a *higher-truth*). From then on any tradie can tell you: ya gonna need to re-establish the foundation then the rebuild can begin, mate.

# Cold-chain hypothesis

The Guardian, the same people that brought us [Peter Daszak](http://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=2421), also proudly presented Dominic Dwyer. (Along with Nature, they're all in on The Great Obfuscation.)

[Dwyer:](https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/feb/22/i-was-on-the-whos-covid-mission-to-china-heres-what-we-found) *Then there was the “cold chain” hypothesis. This is **the idea** the virus might have **originated from elsewhere** via the farming, catching, processing, transporting, refrigeration or freezing of food. Was that food **ice-cream**, fish, wildlife meat? We don’t know.*

So we're *idea-engineering* now? Why are you even talking about it Dominic? It's a [fringe theory](https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/vaccines-coronavirus-china-conspiracy-theories/2021/01/20/89bd3d2a-5a2d-11eb-a849-6f9423a75ffd_story.html).

**Dwyer:** *But to what extent did it contribute to its spread? Again, we don’t know.*

Again - why are you talking about it? Would it have anything to do with *not talking* about the elephant in the room - that it may have leaked from a bio-defense lab?

**Dwyer:** *Several “cold chain” products present in the Wuhan market were not tested for the virus. ..*  *Environmental sampling in the market showed viral surface contamination.*

As it would since there was a cluster outbreak there - after the original cases - that had **[no connection to the market](https://9now.nine.com.au/60-minutes/covid19-patient-zero-may-not-have-contracted-the-virus-from-wuhan-wet-market-who/10a22ff3-7773-4a98-8191-200a13bbc69b)**. A fact that you were fully aware of.

**Dwyer:** *This may indicate the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 through infected people …*

May indicate? We can safely say *‘extremely likely’* since there *was* an outbreak there. Where are you going with this?

*…. (O)r contaminated animal products and **“cold chain”** products.*

Oh, still on your *cold chain* hypothesis.

**Dwyer:** *Investigation of “cold chain” products and virus survival at low temperatures is still underway.*

I bet it is. Which, as you mentioned many many times, will take “many many years” (plus a Gravy Train full of many many money) and hopefully get things even further out in the weeds - till - no-one knows/cares what happened and we all *move on* to the Next Disease X.

Same as Anthrax, SARS-1, MERS. AIDS

**Here's my cold-chain hypothesis:**

Your involvement in the WHO SARS-1 Origin investigation - went cold - due to you covering-up details of its origin. But why take that incredible risk?

The answer might be in your own words - with a slight tweak

[Dwyer:](https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/feb/22/i-was-on-the-whos-covid-mission-to-china-heres-what-we-found) *Then there was the “cold chain” hypothesis. This is the idea the virus might have **originated from elsewhere** via the farming, catching, processing, transporting, **lab experimenting on.** refrigeration or freezing of wildlife **viruses** **by scientists**.*

Is that what happened Dominic? Caught in the caves of SE Asia, farmed in lab cages (cruelly), GoFFed up, refrigerated/frozen, in a Bat Lab offshore, then [smuggled](https://dulandrift.formosahut.com/books/the-covid-atrocity/page/prox-o-authors-ebola-blueprint) into Wuhan as frozen samples?

I'm starting to warm up to your Cold-Chain, after all.

Or am i over-complicating it - you simply fell for a nasty honey-trap somewhere along the journey? Now you'd say or do anything to appease the CCP?

Must have been something big - to make you hang in there so long as world-expert-salesperson for a totalitarian regime.

If you want to come clean, Dominic, it’s not too late. Well it *is* too late for the dead &amp; the cyber-surveillance *War on Freedom*, but to give you the last word:

(We can) *[continue to learn from our experiences](https://theconversation.com/i-was-the-australian-doctor-on-the-whos-covid-19-mission-to-china-heres-what-we-found-about-the-origins-of-the-coronavirus-155554) to improve how we investigate the next pandemic.*