# Rosenberg-CIA

**[Deseret News, Apr 2002: ](https://www.deseret.com/2002/4/22/19650725/scientists-hatch-own-theories-on-anthrax)** (L)eading scientists — many **fearful** that an unsolved case will encourage other bioterrorists — are applying their deductive reasoning to the anthrax-laced letters that killed five people and spread a new level of fear about biological warfare.

Their theories are full of intrigue: A disgruntled scientist. A **covert government project gone awry**. An accomplice to the **Sept. 11** hijackers who stayed behind to mail the letters after their planes hit the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. **Right-wing extremists** stockpiling the deadly material in anticipation of a visit from the **Internal Revenue Service**.

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;">**[BBC/Susan Watts, March 2002:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/archive/1873368.stm)** A Newsnight investigation raised the possibility that there was a secret CIA project to investigate methods of sending anthrax through the mail which went madly out of control. </span>

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"> The shocking assertion is that a key member of the covert operation may have **removed, refined** and eventually **posted** weapons-grade anthrax which killed five people. .. </span><span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;">But has the FBI found the whole case **too hot** to handle? </span>

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;">**[Prof Barbara Hatch Rosenberg:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/archive/1873368.stm)** <span style="font-weight: 400;">Some</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> **very expert** field person would have been given this job and it would have been left to him to decide exactly how to carry it out. The result might have been a project gone **badly awry** if he decided to use it for his own purposes and target the media and the senate for his own motives as not intended by the govt project...but this is a possibility that I think needs to be considered.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;">**[BBC's Tim Franks, 19 Dec 2001:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1719534.stm)** I'm **told** the FBI is now centring its investigations on just four or five laboratories that received anthrax from the **Dugway Proving Ground** in Utah. </span>

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"> The first person to push the theory that the terrorist is a **government-related insider** is the biological weapons **expert**, Professor Barbara Hatch Rosenberg. </span>

**Atlantic:** Rosenberg **.. <span style="font-weight: 400;"> (who) once served as a </span>low-level bioweapons adviser to President Clinton ..**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> (was) a passionate </span>**crusader against** <span style="font-weight: 400;">the use of </span>bioweapons. (S)he was<span style="font-weight: 400;"> .. convinced that an American scientist was to blame for the anthrax attacks. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Rosenberg's investigations </span>**led her to Hatfill**<span style="font-weight: 400;">. (Hatfill says he believes Rosenberg was </span>made aware of him by a former acquaintance, a defense contractor with whom Hatfill had clashed over a proposed counter-anthrax training program<span style="font-weight: 400;"> intended for the U.S. Marshals Service.) She</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> wrote a paper she called “Possible Portrait of the Anthrax Perpetrator,” which was </span>**disseminated on the Internet**<span style="font-weight: 400;">. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">[**Deseret News, Apr 22, 2002:**](https://www.deseret.com/2002/4/22/19650725/scientists-hatch-own-theories-on-anthrax)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (A) molecular biologist</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">, (she)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> began the scientific sleuthing in Feburary</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (sic) </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">when she posted an article on the Web site of the Federation of American Scientists, [**www.fas.org/bwc**](http://www.fas.org/bwc), </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">(dead-link, unfortunately)</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Rosenberg estimates that perhaps </span>**fewer than 40 people** could be **suspects.**

<span style="font-weight: 400;">She believes that </span>the **perpetrator** is **one of her own**<span style="font-weight: 400;">: a disgruntled American scientist.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[Prof Rosenberg:](https://www.deseret.com/2002/4/22/19650725/scientists-hatch-own-theories-on-anthrax)** He must be </span>**angry** at some **biodefense agency**<span style="font-weight: 400;">. He is driven to demonstrate, in a </span>**spectacular way**<span style="font-weight: 400;">, his capabilities and the **government's inability** to respond.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">He is </span>**cocksure** that he can **get away with it.** <span style="font-weight: 400;">Does </span>he **know something** <span style="font-weight: 400;">that he believes to be sufficiently damaging to the United States to make him **untouchable** by the FBI?</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[BBC/Franks:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1719534.stm)**  The </span>**weaponised anthrax**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> is made by a highly secret process belonging to the United States, and the material seems to **fit that recipe**. Their best lead at present is the contractor that </span>**worked for the CIA**<span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span>