# Stephen Hatfill

(under construction) A cautionary tale

# Rosenberg-CIA

**[Deseret News, Apr 2002: ](https://www.deseret.com/2002/4/22/19650725/scientists-hatch-own-theories-on-anthrax)** (L)eading scientists — many **fearful** that an unsolved case will encourage other bioterrorists — are applying their deductive reasoning to the anthrax-laced letters that killed five people and spread a new level of fear about biological warfare.

Their theories are full of intrigue: A disgruntled scientist. A **covert government project gone awry**. An accomplice to the **Sept. 11** hijackers who stayed behind to mail the letters after their planes hit the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. **Right-wing extremists** stockpiling the deadly material in anticipation of a visit from the **Internal Revenue Service**.

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;">**[BBC/Susan Watts, March 2002:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/archive/1873368.stm)** A Newsnight investigation raised the possibility that there was a secret CIA project to investigate methods of sending anthrax through the mail which went madly out of control. </span>

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"> The shocking assertion is that a key member of the covert operation may have **removed, refined** and eventually **posted** weapons-grade anthrax which killed five people. .. </span><span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;">But has the FBI found the whole case **too hot** to handle? </span>

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;">**[Prof Barbara Hatch Rosenberg:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/archive/1873368.stm)** <span style="font-weight: 400;">Some</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> **very expert** field person would have been given this job and it would have been left to him to decide exactly how to carry it out. The result might have been a project gone **badly awry** if he decided to use it for his own purposes and target the media and the senate for his own motives as not intended by the govt project...but this is a possibility that I think needs to be considered.</span></span>

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;">**[BBC's Tim Franks, 19 Dec 2001:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1719534.stm)** I'm **told** the FBI is now centring its investigations on just four or five laboratories that received anthrax from the **Dugway Proving Ground** in Utah. </span>

<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"> The first person to push the theory that the terrorist is a **government-related insider** is the biological weapons **expert**, Professor Barbara Hatch Rosenberg. </span>

**Atlantic:** Rosenberg **.. <span style="font-weight: 400;"> (who) once served as a </span>low-level bioweapons adviser to President Clinton ..**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> (was) a passionate </span>**crusader against** <span style="font-weight: 400;">the use of </span>bioweapons. (S)he was<span style="font-weight: 400;"> .. convinced that an American scientist was to blame for the anthrax attacks. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Rosenberg's investigations </span>**led her to Hatfill**<span style="font-weight: 400;">. (Hatfill says he believes Rosenberg was </span>made aware of him by a former acquaintance, a defense contractor with whom Hatfill had clashed over a proposed counter-anthrax training program<span style="font-weight: 400;"> intended for the U.S. Marshals Service.) She</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> wrote a paper she called “Possible Portrait of the Anthrax Perpetrator,” which was </span>**disseminated on the Internet**<span style="font-weight: 400;">. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">[**Deseret News, Apr 22, 2002:**](https://www.deseret.com/2002/4/22/19650725/scientists-hatch-own-theories-on-anthrax)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (A) molecular biologist</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">, (she)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> began the scientific sleuthing in Feburary</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (sic) </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">when she posted an article on the Web site of the Federation of American Scientists, [**www.fas.org/bwc**](http://www.fas.org/bwc), </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">(dead-link, unfortunately)</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Rosenberg estimates that perhaps </span>**fewer than 40 people** could be **suspects.**

<span style="font-weight: 400;">She believes that </span>the **perpetrator** is **one of her own**<span style="font-weight: 400;">: a disgruntled American scientist.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[Prof Rosenberg:](https://www.deseret.com/2002/4/22/19650725/scientists-hatch-own-theories-on-anthrax)** He must be </span>**angry** at some **biodefense agency**<span style="font-weight: 400;">. He is driven to demonstrate, in a </span>**spectacular way**<span style="font-weight: 400;">, his capabilities and the **government's inability** to respond.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">He is </span>**cocksure** that he can **get away with it.** <span style="font-weight: 400;">Does </span>he **know something** <span style="font-weight: 400;">that he believes to be sufficiently damaging to the United States to make him **untouchable** by the FBI?</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[BBC/Franks:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1719534.stm)**  The </span>**weaponised anthrax**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> is made by a highly secret process belonging to the United States, and the material seems to **fit that recipe**. Their best lead at present is the contractor that </span>**worked for the CIA**<span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span>

# Lab-exit theory

[**Scott Becker**](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1719534.stm)<span style="font-weight: 400;">[, **Dec 2001**, Association of Public Health Laboratories head:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1719534.stm) *There's security measures that need to be improved in labs across the country. Things as simple as **l***</span>***ocks on refrigerators, key cards for access***<span style="font-weight: 400;"> *into the facilities*.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[BBC Interviewer:](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1719534.stm)** *(A) lot of listeners would be astonished to learn you get*</span> *padlocks on stationery cupboards, but not necessarily, padlocks on refrigerators that have **lethal organisms** in them.*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">We certainly </span>**share that concern**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> (but) the **s**</span>**cientific community**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> has been a </span>very **collegial** community<span style="font-weight: 400;">, and </span>scientists work very well together<span style="font-weight: 400;">. You </span>**know who'**<span style="font-weight: 400;">s working on what organisms around.</span>*

# Prof Don Foster by David Freed

[![image-1651312712445.png](https://dulandrift.formosahut.com/uploads/images/gallery/2022-04/scaled-1680-/image-1651312712445.png)](https://dulandrift.formosahut.com/uploads/images/gallery/2022-04/image-1651312712445.png)[<span style="font-weight: 400;">The Atlantic, David Freed, May 2010:</span> ](https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/05/the-wrong-man/308019/)<span style="font-weight: 400;">  *Don Foster, a*</span> ***professor** of **English**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> at Vassar College and a self-styled literary detective, who had achieved modest </span>**celebrity**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> by examining punctuation and other linguistic fingerprints to identify Joe Klein, who was then a </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Newsweek</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> columnist, as the author of the anonymously written 1996 political novel,</span>[ <span style="font-weight: 400;">Primary Colors</span>](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0783227973/theatlanticmonthA/ref=nosim/)<span style="font-weight: 400;">. </span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">[Historic Mysteries: ](https://www.historicmysteries.com/donald-wayne-foster/) Foster was praised for his keen sleuthing skills. Don Foster also analyzed .. The Night Before Christmas and questioned if it was indeed written by the unanimously-accepted Clement Clarke Moore.</span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Foster first came to prominence in his graduate school work regarding the famous sonnets of Shakespeare. An early edition of the sonnets was dedicated to “Mr. W. H.”, and scholars have debated for centuries who this mysterious man could be. </span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Foster developed a theory that the dedication should actually read “Mr. W. S.” or even “Mr. W. Sh.” indicating **Shakespeare himself.**   
</span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Later, Don Foster **stumbled onto** what he proclaimed to be a **lost poem of Shakespeare**’s titled “A Funerall Elegye in memory of the late Vertuous Maister William Peeter.” </span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">It **wasn’t** one of Shakespeare’s best poems, but **if** it was written by The Bard it **would have been** the first newly **discovered** work in more than 100 years. **Immediately**, some scholars **believed** that Foster was **correct** in his summation, and **several** anthologies included the “new” poem in their collections.</span>*

**[Historic Mysteries: ](https://www.historicmysteries.com/donald-wayne-foster/)** *<span style="font-weight: 400;">Foster</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> later came to the attention of law enforcement officials who requested his help in attempting to determine the authors of two crime-related documents. Foster approached these documents with in-depth analysis using both **computers** and his common sense.</span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;"> (including the Jon Benet Ramsay murder)  
</span>

[**Prof Foster (letter to Patsy Ramsay, June 1997):**](https://www.reddit.com/r/JonBenet/comments/nioun4/donald_foster/)<span style="font-weight: 400;"> *I know you are innocent - know it, absolutely and unequivocally. I will **stake** my personal **reputation** on it. .. The near universal belief - a view encouraged by police behavior - is that you wrote the letter to protect this person who murdered your daughter. I find that impossible to believe.*</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">(Ramsay lawyers declined Foster's offer to help.)</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">[**Prof Foster (to Boulder police, 1998):**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Wayne_Foster#Ramsey_murder_case) *In my opinion, it is not possible that any individual except Patsy Ramsey wrote the ransom note.*</span>

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Foster had since </span>**consulted** with the **FBI**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> on investigations of the </span>**Unabomber**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> and Atlanta’s</span> **Centennial Olympic Park bomb****ing**<span style="font-weight: 400;">, among other cases. </span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Foster surmised that the killer was **an** </span>**American posing** as an Islamic jihadist<span style="font-weight: 400;">. </span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">(A) limited number of American scientists would have had a working knowledge of anthrax. </span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">One of those scientists, **Foster concluded**, was a man named **Steven Hatfill**, a medical doctor who had **once** worked at the Army’s elite Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases **(USAMRIID**), which had stocks of anthrax.</span>*

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[Prof Don Foster, (English) Vassar College February 2002: ](https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/05/the-wrong-man/308019/)** *When I lined up Hatfill’s known movements with the postmark locations of reported biothreats, those hoax anthrax attacks appeared to trail him like a vapor cloud.*</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[Atlantic/David Freed: ](https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/05/the-wrong-man/308019/)** *Scouring the Internet, (Prof) Foster found an interview that Hatfill had given while working at the **National Institutes of Health**, in which he described how bubonic plague could be made with **simple** equipment and used in a bioterror attack.* </span>

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Foster later tracked down an **unpublished novel** Hatfill had written, depicting a fictional bioterror attack on Washington. </span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">He discovered that Hatfill had been in Rhodesia (present-day Zimbabwe) during an anthrax outbreak there in the late 1970s, and that he’d attended medical school near a Rhodesian suburb called **Greendale** - the name of the invented school in the return address of the anthrax letters mailed to the Senate. </span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">The deeper Foster dug, the more Hatfill looked to him like a viable suspect.</span>*

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Foster says he met Rosenberg over lunch in April 2002,</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;"> Prof Don Foster: *(We ) compared notes .. laid out the evidence, such as it was, hers and mine .. found that our **evidence** had led us in the same direction.* </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[David Freed: ](https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/05/the-wrong-man/308019/)** ***Weeks** dragged on\* while he and Rosenberg tried to* </span>***interest the FBI***<span style="font-weight: 400;"> *in their theories.*  </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Don Foster:  *(T)he bureau remained stubbornly unwilling to listen. (2mths later) patience exhausted.* </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Rosenberg met on Capitol Hill with Senate staff members **Special Agent** Van Harp, the senior FBI agent on what by then had been **dubbed** the “Amerithrax” **investigation**, was summoned to the meeting, along with other FBI officials.</span>*

*<span style="font-weight: 400;">\* </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Luxury!</span>

# Foster-Rosenberg-FBI

<span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span>

**Atlantic:** <span style="font-weight: 400;">Although Rosenberg would </span>**later deny e**<span style="font-weight: 400;">ver having identified him publicly or privately, the specific details of her “Portrait” made it clear she had a particular </span>**suspect in mind**<span style="font-weight: 400;">: Steven Hatfill.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Foster says he met Rosenberg over lunch in April 2002, “compared notes,” and “found that our evidence had led us in the same direction.” Weeks dragged on while he and Rosenberg tried to </span>**interest the FBI**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> in their theories, but the bureau remained “stubbornly unwilling to listen.” Two months later, her “patience exhausted,” Rosenberg, according to Foster, met on Capitol Hill with Senate staff members “and laid out the evidence, such as it was, hers and mine.” Special Agent Van Harp, the senior FBI agent on what by then had been dubbed the “Amerithrax” investigation, was summoned to the meeting, along with other FBI officials.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Rosenberg criticized the FBI for not being </span>**aggressive enough**<span style="font-weight: 400;">. “She thought we were </span>**wasting efforts and resources**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> in a particular—or in several areas, and should focus more on who she concluded was responsible for it,” Harp would later testify.</span>

**Did she mention Dr. Hatfill’s name in her presentation?**<span style="font-weight: 400;">” Hatfill’s attorney, former federal prosecutor Thomas G. Connolly, asked Harp during a sworn deposition.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">“</span>**That’s who she was talking about,**<span style="font-weight: 400;">” Harp testified.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Exactly a week after the Rosenberg meeting, the FBI carried out its first search of Hatfill’s apartment, with</span> **television news cameras broadcasting it live.**

# Mr. Z

Quotes are from *[Hatfill v New York Times](https://casetext.com/case/hatfill-v-new-york-times-co-4)* case text.

<div id="bkmrk-shedd%2C-circuit-judge">SHEDD, Circuit Judge (summarising)*: Nicholas Kristof writes a regular column for the editorial page of The* (NY) *Times. During the spring and summer of 2002, Kristof wrote several columns criticizing the FBI's investigation. From May through July 2002, Kristof focused his attention on the FBI's handling of information related to a man he called "Mr. Z." According to Kristof, circumstantial evidence pointed to Mr. Z, who was widely suspected by other scientists of involvement in the anthrax mailings.* </div><div id="bkmrk-"></div><div id="bkmrk-in-kristof%27s-opinion">*In Kristof's opinion, the FBI had not moved **aggressively** enough against Mr. Z. In August 2002, Kristof identified Mr. Z as Dr. Steven J. Hatfill, a research scientist employed by the Department of Defense.*</div>

# Hatfill

[![image-1652002003641.png](https://dulandrift.formosahut.com/uploads/images/gallery/2022-05/scaled-1680-/image-1652002003641.png)](https://dulandrift.formosahut.com/uploads/images/gallery/2022-05/image-1652002003641.png)

<span style="font-weight: 400;"><span class="articleauthor">**[Laura Rozen, blogger, 27 Jun 2002:](http://cryptome.sabotage.org/authors/rozen-l.html)**</span> Who is Steven Hatfill? The Prospect has spoken with **dozens of biowarfare scientists**, other government contractors who work in bio-defense, former medical school associates and colleagues, and sources close to the FBI investigation to get a clearer picture of the Maryland scientist. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hatfill, who was employed as an **Ebola** researcher at USAMRIID from 1997 to 1999, has since worked as a government contractor who specializes in training U.S. Special Forces, embassy employees, emergency workers, and other government officials to respond to biological attacks. .. his colleagues say he is passionately devoted. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hatfill had access to the</span>[ <span style="font-weight: 400;">U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases</span>](http://www.usamriid.army.mil/)<span style="font-weight: 400;"> (USAMRIID) in Frederick, Maryland, up until early March. As one of a handful of places in the country where scientists grow the most lethal germs in order to **develop vaccines** to defend against them, USAMRIID and its Utah cousin,</span>[ <span style="font-weight: 400;">Dugway Proving Grounds</span>](https://www.dugway.army.mil/)<span style="font-weight: 400;">, have been at the center of the eight-month-old FBI investigation. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Last month, genetic analysis of the letter-anthrax suggested that it was indistinguishable from a strain developed at USAMRIID.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hatfill belongs to a **small pool of people** who have access to and detailed knowledge of how to grow and weaponize the highly lethal, concentrated dry powder spores of anthrax that were sent in letters to media personalities and members of Congress last October. Specifically, by virtue of his government contracts, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Hatfill had access to the</span>[ <span style="font-weight: 400;">U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases</span>](http://www.usamriid.army.mil/)<span style="font-weight: 400;"> (USAMRIID) in Frederick, Maryland, up until early March. As one of a handful of places in the country where scientists grow the most lethal germs in order to develop vaccines to defend against them, USAMRIID and its Utah cousin,</span>[ <span style="font-weight: 400;">Dugway Proving Grounds</span>](https://www.dugway.army.mil/)<span style="font-weight: 400;">, have been at the center of the eight-month-old FBI investigation. Last month, genetic analysis of the letter-anthrax suggested that it was **indistinguishable** from a strain developed at USAMRIID.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[WaPo/<span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">Marilyn W. Thompso</span>m, 14 Sep 2003:](https://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/pursuithatfill.html)** Stan Bedlington had known (Hatfill) for several years. They were **drinking buddies** who'd both been involved in anti-terrorism efforts long before the World Trade Center crumbled. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Bedlington, a retired CIA agent, had spent six years as a </span>senior analyst with the **CIA Counter-terrorism** Center.<span style="font-weight: 400;"> Hatfill was working as a </span>**virology researche**<span style="font-weight: 400;">r at the </span>**U.S. Army**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> Medical Research Institute of **Infectious Diseases** at Fort Detrick, where he'd begun making a name for himself </span>**preaching the dangers** <span style="font-weight: 400;">of a bioterror attack.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">(T)</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">hey ran into each other again at Charley's Place in McLean, then a </span>**favorite hangout**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> for the </span>U.S. **intelligence community.** Agents and officials from the CIA and Pentagon **mingled** with **private consultants** and law enforcement agents**.**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> Most were cleared to handle classified information, but after long workdays and a few drinks, the conversation </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">often veered to </span>**tales of dark intrigue** <span style="font-weight: 400;">and, occasionally, into drunken bluster.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hatfill, who first showed up there with men whom Bedlington </span>recognized as **bodyguards for Saudi Arabian Prince** Bandar bin Sultan<span style="font-weight: 400;">, had plenty of stories to tell.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**<span class="articleauthor">[Laura Rozen:](http://cryptome.sabotage.org/authors/rozen-l.html)</span>** </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Indeed, several of his associates have told the Prospect that Hatfill bragged of having been a double agent in South Africa. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">**[WaPo](https://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/pursuithatfill.html)**: </span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> He bragged about being an ex-Green Beret. He walked with a slight limp and told people it was the result of being shot during combat. In a convincing British accent that he could turn on at will, he described parachute jumps and commando training he did under the direction of the </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">**British Special Air Service.** He detailed his exploits as a member of the </span>**Selous Scouts**<span style="font-weight: 400;">, an elite counterinsurgency unit of Rhodesia's white supremacist army that became notorious for brutality during that country's civil war. He even recounted a </span>**devastating outbreak of anthrax poisoning in the Rhodesian bush**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> in the late 1970s, an event later suspected to be part of an effort </span>**by the Selous Scouts**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> to control guerrilla uprisings.</span>

**[Guardian, Jun 2003: ](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jun/01/anthrax.usa)**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> T*he man at the centre of the investigation into the post-9/11 anthrax attacks in the US*</span> ***faked a UK medical degree**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> and membership of the Royal Society of Medicine, to fool his way into a job at America's highest security bio-defence installation.</span>*

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Dr Steven Jay Hatfill was </span>named last August by US Attorney General John Ashcroft <span style="font-weight: 400;">as as the </span>**only** <span style="font-weight: 400;">**'person of interest'** in the investigation and now lives under 24-hour surveillance by the FBI.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Hatfill, a former researcher at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Maryland, denies he is the anthrax killer.   
</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">An investigation by the Observer, carried out with with New York-based current affairs magazine Seed, has discovered that the</span> **cancer specialist and bio-terror expert**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> claimed he had a medical degree from </span>**Edinburgh on CVs used to apply for jobs**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> in the US. He also said he was a Fellow of the prestigious </span>**Royal Society of Medicine**<span style="font-weight: 400;">. The Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh had </span>**no record of Hatfill qualifyin**<span style="font-weight: 400;">g as doctor in 1984, as claimed on his CV. His medical degree is from </span>**Zimbabwe**<span style="font-weight: 400;">, where he qualified in the same year.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Rosamund Snow, RSM spokeswoman, said : 'He is not on our books, nor has he applied to be.'</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The investigation found that Hatfill had</span> **fabricated large portions of his CV, including claims of serving in the Rhodesian SAS**<span style="font-weight: 400;"> and researching for Nasa's Solar System Exploration Division.</span>

**[Guardian, Jun 2002:](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/jun/28/usa.anthrax?CMP=gu_com)** FBI agents investigating the anthrax attacks that killed five people have searched the [Maryland](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/maryland) home of a former US military scientist who commissioned a study into similar attacks three years ago. The study commissioned by Dr Hatfill describes placing 2.5 grams of bacillus globigii, an anthrax simulant, in a standard business envelope.

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Two agents also spent several months in a Washington storage unit, poring over a mountain of forgotten videotape to locate footage of Hatfill's television appearance in 1998. In it, he discussed the likelihood of a biological attack, according to television host Armstrong Williams.</span>

# FBI names Hatfill

[**John Ashcroft, FBI, The Early Show, CBS Aug 6, 2002** ](https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2002/08/29/the-fbi-problem/9dda4346-a18c-4862-ab55-d7f2030c5d33/)<span style="font-weight: 400;">(asked whether Hatfill was a suspect): </span>*<span style="font-weight: 400;">Well, he's a </span>**person of interest**<span style="font-weight: 400;">. . . . I'm not prepared to say any more at this time other than the fact that he is an individual of interest.</span>*

# The draining of the pond

http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/detect/antdetect\_letters\_a.htm